Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Smart Sustainable Cities Implementation in Zambia: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Political Will and Barriers to SMART Sustainable CITIES

Received: 23 November 2024     Accepted: 6 December 2024     Published: 23 December 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The emergence of smart sustainable cities (SSCs) offers a potential solution to many urban development challenges, prompting various cities and nations, including Zambia, to adopt this concept. However, it is essential to recognize the significant role that politics plays in the implementation of SSCs in Zambia. This study aimed to explore the relationship between political will and the barriers to the development of SSCs in the country. Using a quantitative research method, a questionnaire survey was administered via Google Forms, gathering responses from 92 participants. The study examined the relationship between prioritized barriers and the lack of political will, employing the Kendall Tau b correlation coefficient. A positive correlation of varying significance was found between the lack of political will and the barriers to SSC implementation in Zambia. Particularly strong correlations were identified between the lack of political will and several barriers, including insufficient knowledge and information sharing, inadequate research and development funding, lack of technological capacity, limited use of information and communication technology (ICT) for environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, insufficient funding for SSC initiatives, as well as centralized decision-making processes and top-down approaches. While this study was conducted in Zambia, the findings may not significantly differ from those in other developing countries.

Published in Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16
Page(s) 246-253
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Smart Sustainable Cities, Implementation, Zambia, Relationship, Politics, Barriers

References
[1] D. Kundu and A. K. Pandey, “World Urbanisation: Trends and Patterns,” in Developing National Urban Policies, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2020, pp. 13–49.
[2] X. Q. Zhang, “The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world,” Habitat Int, vol. 54, pp. 241–252, May 2016,
[3] A. Townsend, “Townsend, A. (2013). Smart Cities Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York, NY W. W. Norton and Company. - References - Scientific Research Publishing.” Accessed: Oct. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[4] S. A. Al-Nasrawi, C. Adams, and A. El-Zaart, “A Conceptual Multidimensional Model for Assessing Smart Sustainable Cities,” Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, vol. 12, no. 3, Jan. 2016,
[5] Zambia Statistics Agency, “2022 Census of Population and Housing Preliminary Report,” Lusaka, Dec. 2022.
[6] Central Statistical Office, “2010 Census of Population and Housing National Analytical Report,” Lusaka, Dec. 2012.
[7] UN-HABITAT, “Briefing Note Zambia,” Nairobi, Kenya, 2023.
[8] World Bank, “Zambia Urbanization Review Policy Note,” Washington D. C, 2022.
[9] Smart Cities Council, “Smart Cities Readiness Guide: The planning guide manual for building tomorrows cities today,” Australia, 2013.
[10] J. H. Lee, M. G. Hancock, and M.-C. Hu, “Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco,” Technological Forecasting Social Change, vol. 89, pp. 80–99, Nov. 2014,
[11] T. Yigitcanlar et al., “Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework,” Cities, vol. 81, pp. 145–160, Nov. 2018,
[12] K. Harrison, “Who Is the Assumed User in the Smart City?” in Designing, Developing, and Facilitating Smart Cities, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 17–32.
[13] C. Manville, R. Europe, J. Millard, D. Technological Institute, A. Liebe, and R. Massink, “DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY Mapping Smart Cities in the EU STUDY,” 2014.
[14] S. Myeong, Y. Jung, and E. Lee, “A Study on Determinant Factors in Smart City Development: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis,” Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 2606, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 2606, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.3390/SU10082606.
[15] L. G. Anthopoulos, “Governing a Smart City,” 2017, pp. 215–262.
[16] I. Mutambik, “Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Smart Cities: Barriers and Strategies,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 12, p. 5061, Jun. 2024,
[17] L. Schuch de Azambuja, “Drivers and Barriers for the development of Smart Sustainable Cities:” in 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Oct. 2021, pp. 422–428.
[18] Jayasena. N. S., Mallawaarachchi. H, and Waidyasekara. K. G. A. S., “Critical Review on the Drivers and Barriers for Enabling Smart Cities,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangkok, Thailand: IEOM Society International, Mar. 2019.
[19] N. P. Rana, S. Luthra, S. K. Mangla, R. Islam, S. Roderick, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 503–525, Jun. 2019,
[20] P. C. Enwereji and D. Uwizeyimana, “Smart City Readiness in South African Municipalities: A Qualitative Study,” HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 93–109, Jul. 2022, d
[21] T. B. Bayu, “Smart leadership for smart cities,” Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 41–62, Jun. 2020, [Online]. Available:
[22] A. Wiig and E. Wyly, “Introduction: Thinking through the politics of the smart city,” May 18, 2016, Routledge.
[23] J. Pries-Heje and J. Cranefield, “Smart Leadership for Smart Cities: A Leadership Role Framework,” in Transforming for Sustainability, Copenhagen, Denmark: Roskilde University, 2018.
[24] A. S. Singh and M. B. Masuku, “Sampling Techniques and Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: An Overview Article in International Journal of Commerce and Management,” 2014. [Online]. Available:
[25] J. Daikeler, H. Silber, and M. Bošnjak, “A Meta-Analysis of How Country-Level Factors Affect Web Survey Response Rates,” International Journal of Market Research, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 306–333, May 2022,
[26] R. R. R. M. Rooshdi, M. Z. A. Majid, S. R. Sahamir, and N. A. A. Ismail, “Relative Importance Index of Sustainable Design and Construction Activities Criteria for Green Highway,” Chem Eng Trans, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 151–156, 2018, d
[27] V. D. Sakhare and G. S. Patil, “Construction Equipment Monitoring: By Using Relative Important Indices (RII) Analysis,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2019, [Online]. Available:
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Chipulu, C., Kaliba, C., Mwiya, B., Coleman, C. E. (2024). Smart Sustainable Cities Implementation in Zambia: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Political Will and Barriers to SMART Sustainable CITIES. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 9(6), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Chipulu, C.; Kaliba, C.; Mwiya, B.; Coleman, C. E. Smart Sustainable Cities Implementation in Zambia: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Political Will and Barriers to SMART Sustainable CITIES. J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2024, 9(6), 246-253. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Chipulu C, Kaliba C, Mwiya B, Coleman CE. Smart Sustainable Cities Implementation in Zambia: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Political Will and Barriers to SMART Sustainable CITIES. J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2024;9(6):246-253. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16,
      author = {Chipulu Chipulu and Chabota Kaliba and Balimu Mwiya and Charles Egyabeng Coleman},
      title = {Smart Sustainable Cities Implementation in Zambia: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Political Will and Barriers to SMART Sustainable CITIES
    },
      journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {246-253},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20240906.16},
      abstract = {The emergence of smart sustainable cities (SSCs) offers a potential solution to many urban development challenges, prompting various cities and nations, including Zambia, to adopt this concept. However, it is essential to recognize the significant role that politics plays in the implementation of SSCs in Zambia. This study aimed to explore the relationship between political will and the barriers to the development of SSCs in the country. Using a quantitative research method, a questionnaire survey was administered via Google Forms, gathering responses from 92 participants. The study examined the relationship between prioritized barriers and the lack of political will, employing the Kendall Tau b correlation coefficient. A positive correlation of varying significance was found between the lack of political will and the barriers to SSC implementation in Zambia. Particularly strong correlations were identified between the lack of political will and several barriers, including insufficient knowledge and information sharing, inadequate research and development funding, lack of technological capacity, limited use of information and communication technology (ICT) for environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, insufficient funding for SSC initiatives, as well as centralized decision-making processes and top-down approaches. While this study was conducted in Zambia, the findings may not significantly differ from those in other developing countries.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Smart Sustainable Cities Implementation in Zambia: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Political Will and Barriers to SMART Sustainable CITIES
    
    AU  - Chipulu Chipulu
    AU  - Chabota Kaliba
    AU  - Balimu Mwiya
    AU  - Charles Egyabeng Coleman
    Y1  - 2024/12/23
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16
    T2  - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
    JF  - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
    JO  - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
    SP  - 246
    EP  - 253
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-3890
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20240906.16
    AB  - The emergence of smart sustainable cities (SSCs) offers a potential solution to many urban development challenges, prompting various cities and nations, including Zambia, to adopt this concept. However, it is essential to recognize the significant role that politics plays in the implementation of SSCs in Zambia. This study aimed to explore the relationship between political will and the barriers to the development of SSCs in the country. Using a quantitative research method, a questionnaire survey was administered via Google Forms, gathering responses from 92 participants. The study examined the relationship between prioritized barriers and the lack of political will, employing the Kendall Tau b correlation coefficient. A positive correlation of varying significance was found between the lack of political will and the barriers to SSC implementation in Zambia. Particularly strong correlations were identified between the lack of political will and several barriers, including insufficient knowledge and information sharing, inadequate research and development funding, lack of technological capacity, limited use of information and communication technology (ICT) for environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, insufficient funding for SSC initiatives, as well as centralized decision-making processes and top-down approaches. While this study was conducted in Zambia, the findings may not significantly differ from those in other developing countries.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections