Soils viable for engineering works needs to attain certain strength properties in order to serve its intended purpose. Some available soil like Black Cotton Soil tends to show weakness in strength which necessitate it to be modified so that the desired strength can be achieved, this can be executed using materials that could improve the soil properties such as gypsum, lime, bagasse ash, cement, etc. This paper is a review of the viability of the use of gypsum in proportion to other stabilization material to improve the strength properties of soils. Research shows, gypsum in addition to other stabilization materials such as bagasse ash, rice husk, lime, NaCl, tin, fly ash, jute fibre etc. produce a better stabilized soil as compared to gypsum or any of this material as stand-alone stabilizer. Laboratory result after series of experiment to determine the Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content, Unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio CBR and Atterberg limit values of the stabilized soil using gypsum with other additives, reveals that for effective soil stabilization with the use of gypsum and any other additives is a function of the type of soil being stabilized, nature of additives, percentage of applied additives, curing time, also the classification of the soil to stabilized. It is found that the use of these additives in proportion of each other, their percentage proportioned, curing time and the nature of soil, give different end point of stabilized soil.
Published in | Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11 |
Page(s) | 161-176 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gypsum, Plastic Soil, Black Cotton Soil, Stabilization, California Bearing Ratio, Unconfined Compressive Strength
[1] | Ahmed., A., & Usama, H. I. (2013). stability of soft clay soil stabilised with recycled gypsum in a wet environment’’. new beni-suef city, egypt: beni-suef university, civil engineering department, shark el-nile, beni-suef. |
[2] | Al-Adili, A., Salim, N. M., & Al-Soudany, K. Y. (2019). ‘’Response Of Soft Soil Mixing With Recycled Gypsum (Plasterboard) As Stabilized Agent For Soil Underneath Oil Tank As A Case Study.’’. Baghdad: University Of Technology, Iraq. |
[3] | Ameta, N. K., Purohit, D., & Dangda, S. (2020). Economics Of Stabilizing Bentonite Soil With Lime-Gypsum. Rajasthan, India: M. B. M. Engineering College, J. N. V. University, Jodhpur. |
[4] | Apriyanti, Y., Fahriani, F., & Fauzan, H. (2019.). ‘’Use Of Gypsum Waste And Tin Tailings As Stabilization Materials For Clay To Improve Quality Of Subgrade’’. Indonesia: Department Of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Bangka Belitung, Kampus Terpadu. |
[5] | Batubara, M. H., & Roesyanto., d. (1987). Kajian Kuat Tekan Bebas Pada Stabilitas Tanah Lempung Dengan Gipsum dan Serbuk Kaca. Jurnal Online. |
[6] | Eliana, R., Jaramillo-Pérez, A., Josue, M., Plata-Chaves, B., Carlos, A., & Ríos-Reyes. (2014). ’ The Useof Gypsum Mining By-Product And Lime On The Engineering Properties Of Compressed Earth Blocks’. Bucaramanga, Colombi: Universidad Industrial De Santander. |
[7] | Gupta, M., Goyal, A., & Anaokar, M. (2020). ‘’ Soil Stabilization Using Waste Rice Husk Ash, Cement, Lime & Gypsum’’. Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management And Engineering, Asce. |
[8] | Gvln, M., Siva Kavya, K., Venkata Krishna, A., & Ganesh, B. (2016). ’’chemical stabilization of sub-grade soil with gypsum and nacl’’. india: department of civil engineering, sri vasavi engineering college, tp gudem, ap. |
[9] | Hardiyatmo, H. C. (2010). Stabilisasi Tanah untuk Pekerasan JalanYogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press. |
[10] | Hausmann, M. R. (1990). Engineering Principles of Ground Modification Singapura:. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. |
[11] | Herri Purwanto, A. S. (2020, february). ‘’stabilization of soft clay soil using a gypsum plafond waste based on cbr testing’’. international journal of scientific & technology research, 9 (2). |
[12] | Işık, Y., & Berrin, C. (2009, April). Gypsum: An additive for stabilization of swelling clay soils. Applied Clay Science, 44 (1–2), 166–172. |
[13] | Kolay, P., & Pui, M. (2010). ‘’Peat Stabilization Using Gypsum And Fly Ash’’. Journal Of Civil Engineering, Science And Technology. doi: 10.33736/Jcest.75. |
[14] | Krebs, R. D., & Waker, R. D. (1971). Highway Material. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. |
[15] | Mehmet, S. (2018). ‘’Stabilization Of Bentonite And Kaolinite Clays Using Recycled Gypsum And Liquid Sodium Silicate’’. A Thesis Submitted To The Faculty OfThe University Of Delaware In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Master Of Civil Engineering Winter. |
[16] | Özgür, K., Recep, K., & Koray, U. (2012). ‘’Effect Of Lime And Gypsum On Stabilization Of High Plasticity Clay’’. soil Mechanics Laboratory Of Technical Research And Quality Control. Ankara, Turkey: Department Of State Hydraulic Works (Dsi). |
[17] | Peddaiah, S., & et-al. (2017). ‘’investigating the effect of gypsum and nacl on the engineering properties of clay soil’’. international journal of engineering and technology, (ijet), 9 (4). doi: 10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i4/170904409. |
[18] | Rahman, Z., Lee, J., Rahim, S., Lihan, T., & Idris, W. (2015). Application Of Gypsum And Fly Ash As Additives In Stabilization Of Tropical Peat Soil’’. Bangi Selangor, Malaysia; Ukm 43600: school Of Environmental And Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty Of Science And Technology. |
[19] | Roesyanto., Iskandar, R., Hastuty, I., & Aiu, L. (2017.). ‘’A Study Of The Effectiveness Of The Use Of Gypsum And Volcanic Ash Against The Stability Of Clay Soil In Terms Of Uct And Cbr Values’’. Medan, Indonesia: Civil Engineering Department, University Of Sumatera Utara. |
[20] | Roesyanto., Riskandar., Hastuty, I. P., & Dianty, W. O. (2018). ‘’stabilization by using gypsum and paddy husk ash with reference to uct and cbr value’. indonesia: civil engineering department, university of sumatera utara, medan. |
[21] | Sadam, H. K. (2019). ’’use of gypsum and bagasse ash for stabilization of low plastic and high plastic clay’’. institute of civil engineering, national university of science and technology j. appl. res. ind. eng, 6, 251–267. |
[22] | Suraj, S., Ashish, S., & Guleria, S. (2018). ‘’ stabilization of soft clay soil using gypsum’’. india: department of civil engineering, jawaharlal nehru govt. engineering college sundernagar. |
[23] | Syafwandi, M. I., Mohamad, S., & Acep, H. (2020). ‘’soil stabilization using gypsum and the effect based on the unconfined compressive strength values’’. indonesia: faculty of engineering, university mercu buana jakarta. |
[24] | William, C. (2020). ‘’Soil Stabilization Using Gypsum And Powdered Glass’’. China International Journal Of Research In Circuits Devices And Systems, 1 (1), 15-17. |
APA Style
Muhammad Aishat Sani, Adamu Umar Chinade, Abubakar Mamuda, Ahmad Batari, Muhammad Dalhatu Abdullahi. (2021). Effect of Gypsum in Proportion of Other Additives Used in Stabilizion of Deficient Soils: A Review. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 6(6), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11
ACS Style
Muhammad Aishat Sani; Adamu Umar Chinade; Abubakar Mamuda; Ahmad Batari; Muhammad Dalhatu Abdullahi. Effect of Gypsum in Proportion of Other Additives Used in Stabilizion of Deficient Soils: A Review. J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2021, 6(6), 161-176. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11
AMA Style
Muhammad Aishat Sani, Adamu Umar Chinade, Abubakar Mamuda, Ahmad Batari, Muhammad Dalhatu Abdullahi. Effect of Gypsum in Proportion of Other Additives Used in Stabilizion of Deficient Soils: A Review. J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2021;6(6):161-176. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11
@article{10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11, author = {Muhammad Aishat Sani and Adamu Umar Chinade and Abubakar Mamuda and Ahmad Batari and Muhammad Dalhatu Abdullahi}, title = {Effect of Gypsum in Proportion of Other Additives Used in Stabilizion of Deficient Soils: A Review}, journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering}, volume = {6}, number = {6}, pages = {161-176}, doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20210606.11}, abstract = {Soils viable for engineering works needs to attain certain strength properties in order to serve its intended purpose. Some available soil like Black Cotton Soil tends to show weakness in strength which necessitate it to be modified so that the desired strength can be achieved, this can be executed using materials that could improve the soil properties such as gypsum, lime, bagasse ash, cement, etc. This paper is a review of the viability of the use of gypsum in proportion to other stabilization material to improve the strength properties of soils. Research shows, gypsum in addition to other stabilization materials such as bagasse ash, rice husk, lime, NaCl, tin, fly ash, jute fibre etc. produce a better stabilized soil as compared to gypsum or any of this material as stand-alone stabilizer. Laboratory result after series of experiment to determine the Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content, Unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio CBR and Atterberg limit values of the stabilized soil using gypsum with other additives, reveals that for effective soil stabilization with the use of gypsum and any other additives is a function of the type of soil being stabilized, nature of additives, percentage of applied additives, curing time, also the classification of the soil to stabilized. It is found that the use of these additives in proportion of each other, their percentage proportioned, curing time and the nature of soil, give different end point of stabilized soil.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Gypsum in Proportion of Other Additives Used in Stabilizion of Deficient Soils: A Review AU - Muhammad Aishat Sani AU - Adamu Umar Chinade AU - Abubakar Mamuda AU - Ahmad Batari AU - Muhammad Dalhatu Abdullahi Y1 - 2021/12/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11 T2 - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JF - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JO - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering SP - 161 EP - 176 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3890 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.11 AB - Soils viable for engineering works needs to attain certain strength properties in order to serve its intended purpose. Some available soil like Black Cotton Soil tends to show weakness in strength which necessitate it to be modified so that the desired strength can be achieved, this can be executed using materials that could improve the soil properties such as gypsum, lime, bagasse ash, cement, etc. This paper is a review of the viability of the use of gypsum in proportion to other stabilization material to improve the strength properties of soils. Research shows, gypsum in addition to other stabilization materials such as bagasse ash, rice husk, lime, NaCl, tin, fly ash, jute fibre etc. produce a better stabilized soil as compared to gypsum or any of this material as stand-alone stabilizer. Laboratory result after series of experiment to determine the Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content, Unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio CBR and Atterberg limit values of the stabilized soil using gypsum with other additives, reveals that for effective soil stabilization with the use of gypsum and any other additives is a function of the type of soil being stabilized, nature of additives, percentage of applied additives, curing time, also the classification of the soil to stabilized. It is found that the use of these additives in proportion of each other, their percentage proportioned, curing time and the nature of soil, give different end point of stabilized soil. VL - 6 IS - 6 ER -